n.b. Chrome users need to refresh their browsers to ensure they have the latest content.
Meeting held Wednesday, January 25 2017, 7:30pm Shoreline Community College
|
||||||||||
For January 2017 the PNW Section had two of their own talk about and demonstrate how to make poor acoustic mixing spaces better. Since most of us are forced to use mixing rooms never designed as such, this meeting showed simple, low-cost methods to figure out what to do and then treat that. James "JJ" Johnston (retired) and Bob Smith (almost retired) spoke to an audience of 62 (27 AES members) at Shoreline Community College Music room 818.
JJ began the evening, assuming one is given a room to mix in that may be pretty poor acoustically - hard walls, odd shapes, and poor sound. First, he emphasized that any acoustic material MUST be ASTM International (formerly American Society for Testing and Materials) rated for flammability. No egg crates, packing foam, blankets, etc. Bob Smith reiterated that a fire marshal can legally shut you down immediately if you can't show the rating for any material you use. A demo speaker and measurement mic had been set up next to a hard wall/whiteboard. A swept sine tone was played and the ETC (Energy Time Curve) calculated and displayed, showing early reflections off the wall and floor. They demonstrated calculating the distance of reflections and using a piece of string stretched between the speaker and mic to pinpoint the reflections and thus, where to apply acoustic treatment. JJ suggested trying to set up for symmetrically, and to try clapping your hands to listen for obvious acoustic flaws (fluttering, echoes) and work on these first. These flaws really affect the sound. Framed acoustic foam panels on the wall work for medium/high frequencies because of the wavelengths involved. For lower frequency absorption, panels have to be set away from the wall. 9 inches or so will work down to about 282Hz. Ceilings are hard to work on cheaply and temporarily. And never paint acoustic materials, like tiles - this covers their acoustic structure and they won't work right any more. After a break, door prizes were given to:
He suggested using the monitor speakers you'll use (instead of a random test speaker); an ordinary audio interface; a low-cost measurement mic (i.e. Parts Express); measurement/analysis software; and a tape measure and string. A Parts Express mic works fine for $50. He described various steps for analysis depending on the software chosen. Different softwares have different analysis features. On some, you may have to use auxiliary software or calculations. Different excitation signals were described. In the end, you still want to find the distances for reflections in order to treat them.
Reported by Gary Louie, PNW Section Secretary |